I just rediscovered Rubeque, a set of short problems/koans to solve using Ruby, ranging in difficulty from “What does true equal?” to writing simple AIs and solving logic puzzles. The web UI provides an interactive code editor that you can use to write your solution in Ruby and see if the tests pass.
I found this problem particularly interesting. The task is to write an S-expression evaluator in Ruby. S-expressions are provided in the tests as nested arrays of symbols (:the :ruby :kind) and other values. The symbols represent functions, which is convenient because out of the box, Ruby gives you the ability to refer to and call functions by using their names as symbols. For example, 49.to_s (i.e.calling the method to_s on the number 49) can also be expressed like this: 49.send(:to_s). This means we can dynamically send any symbol (representing a function) to any value and it will be evaluated as a function call, which is basically all it takes to write an S-expression evaluator.
Another thing that’s convenient about Ruby is that, like in Lisp, arithmetic operators like +, - and * are actually just functions. In Ruby’s case, they happen to be instance methods of the Fixnum class. To prove this, you can open up irb and type in 75.+(25), which you’ll see is equivalent to typing 75 + 25. In Ruby, the a + b infix notation is actually syntactic sugar for calling the underlying Fixnum methods. The reason this is convenient is that we can pass and call arithmetic operations just like any other function. In irb, try typing 75.send(:+, 25) and you’ll see what I mean.
One difference between Ruby and Lisp, however, is that in Lisp, you can supply as many arguments as you want to the arithmetic functions, e.g. (+ 1 1 1 1) => 4. In Ruby, (presumably to be consistent with the infix notation), arithmetic operations are limited to 2 arguments – OK, technically it’s 1 number object receiving the arithmetic function with another number as a single argument. Thanks to monkey-patching, it’s easy enough to Lispify Ruby’s arithmetic functions by redefining them to take a variable number of arguments:
classFixnumalias_method:plus,:+def+(*others)([self]+others).inject{|sum,x|sum.plus(x)}endalias_method:minus,:-def-(*others)([self]+others).inject{|diff,x|diff.minus(x)}endendFrom here, implementing an S-expression evaluator is about as simple as separating out the functions from the arguments, and calling said functions with said arguments. We can write some guards to make sure the actual evaluating / passing-arguments-to-functions part only takes place if the head of the S-expression is some kind of function (represented in Ruby as a symbol or a proc). Otherwise, we assume that we’re looking at some kind of value, or an array of things that each need to be evaluated recursively.
With this in mind, possible solutions can be delightfully terse:
defsexp_eval(sexp)returnsexpunlesssexp.is_a?Arrayreturnsexp.map{|x|sexp_evalx}unless[Symbol,Proc].include?sexp.first.classfn,*args=*sexpargs=sexp_evalargsfn.to_proc.call(*args)end# Rubeque's testssexp1=[:flatten,[1,2,[:to_a,(4..6)],[:-,8,4]]]sexp2=[:==,[:*,2,3],[:remainder,13,7]]sexp3=[(->x,y{Math.sqrt(x**2+y**2)}),[:-,9,3,3],[:+,1,1,1,1]]assert_equalsexp_eval(sexp1),[1,2,4,5,6,4]assert_equalsexp_eval(sexp2),trueassert_equalsexp_eval(sexp3),5.0